Bias and Neutrality


Based on the cover image, it's now obvious the difference between TPP and FPP. While this terminology is most commonly associated with the gaming world, if we take a closer look and try to resonate it with the decision-making perspective, then it becomes apparent that it aligns with the concepts of Neutrality(TPP: Third-person perspective) and Bias(FPP: First-person perspective). In this blog, we will delve into the intriguing interplay of these two concepts and explore how they shape our perceptions and choices.

TPP offers a broader and more impartial vantage point, this perspective enables a player to see the entire playing field, avoiding personal biases and gaining a more holistic understanding of the game's dynamics. Similarly, in the realm of decision-making, adopting a TPP mindset means striving for neutrality and objectivity. It involves taking a step back to consider all relevant factors without letting personal emotions or preconceived notions cloud judgment. This perspective is valuable in both gaming and real-life scenarios, as it fosters fairness, balance, and a clearer view of the bigger picture.

Adopting a TPP approach means acknowledging the presence of multiple perspectives and viewpoints. It involves considering the needs and concerns of all stakeholders, making choices that are free from personal bias, and striving to reach decisions that promote fairness and inclusivity. Whether in the virtual realm or real life, embracing TPP can lead to more balanced, just, and equitable outcomes.

In contrast to TPP, FPP, or First-Person Perspective, is a viewpoint that immerses players in the game world from a personal and subjective standpoint. This perspective often embodies the player's own biases, as they navigate the game through their character's eyes. In decision-making, the FPP mindset mirrors this subjectivity, as individuals may unknowingly let their personal biases influence their choices. These biases can stem from various sources, such as cultural background, past experiences, or personal preferences, and they can lead to decisions that are skewed and unfair.

Moreover, FPP can also create a sense of 'tunnel vision,' where individuals may focus solely on their immediate experiences and perspectives, neglecting the broader context. This can limit the ability to consider alternative viewpoints and lead to suboptimal decisions.

In real-life decision-making, there are instances where the First-Person Perspective (FPP) proves more suitable than the Third-Person Perspective (TPP). This transition is often prompted by the need for personal expertise, deep familiarity with the subject matter, and a strong emotional connection. When making choices that require personal insight, individual experiences, or an in-depth understanding of a specific context, FPP can provide a more nuanced, authentic, and effective approach to decision-making. Recognizing when to shift between FPP and TPP is crucial to adapting to the unique requirements of different situations and making well-informed, context-specific decisions.

In conclusion, the choice between FPP and TPP in decision-making is not an either-or proposition but a dynamic process that depends on the specific parameters of each case. The suitability of FPP or TPP hinges on the context, the need for personal involvement, and the desired level of objectivity.

Ultimately, it is up to us as decision-makers to assess the unique requirements of each situation and select the perspective that aligns with the goals and values we aim to achieve. Being aware of the interplay between bias and neutrality, and recognizing when to draw on personal insights or step back for a more comprehensive view, empowers us to make more informed and effective decisions.

In this dynamic dance between FPP and TPP, our ability to adapt and apply the right perspective is the key to navigating the complexities of decision-making, whether in the gaming world or the real world.

Bonus Anology[try to resonate this with the cover image]: FPP \= While awake our daily life is viewed in FFP mode, TPP \= While we are asleep we dream in TPP mode.

In an alternative perspective, we can equate FPP to our conscious mind while awake and TPP to our subconscious mind during dreams. FPP represents our awareness, logic, and rationality in our waking hours, while TPP mirrors the realm of dreams.